November
19
'Cap' writers an encouraging hire; new 'X' writer less so
Two major Marvel announcements hit this morning, one of which is enouraging and the other less so.
On the encouraging side is the hiring of writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely to write the screenplay for "The First Avenger: Captain America." The duo were named one of Variety's 10 Screenwriters to Watch in 2005 and have penned the acclaimed HBO biopic "The Life and Death of Peter Sellers" as well as having worked on both Narnia pics to date. Variety wrote in 2005 that the duo have a talent for making the familiar feel fresh and work in a very collaborative, craftsman-like way. That bodes well for bringing some heft and energy to the "Cap" movie, which is to be set during World War II and lead into the "Avengers" pic.
On the less-encouraging side is Fox's hiring of Josh Schwartz to write the continuation of the X-Men films (follow this link to order "Mutant Cinema," my book on the previous X-flicks) in a project called "X-Men: First Class." The idea of continuing the X-Men franchise with younger characters has been discussed since the release of "X-Men: The Last Stand" in 2006 as a way to get around the scheduling nightmares and expense of reuniting the original cast. It also lets Fox retool the franchise for a new audience — and Schwartz's hiring seems to confirm the studio wants to go younger and soapier with the next installment.
The fear for fans is that the project will deviate too much from what makes the X-Men successful and enter embarassment territory. And for a lot of fans, an X-Men pic infused too much of the soap and comedy that makes "O.C." "Chuck" and "Gossip Girl" work as TV shows will be at the very best a second-tier version of a first-class concept.
This is something that Marvel's many X-Men comicbook spinoffs have faced over the years as well. While I am a big fan of the early run of "The New Mutants" — especially the Bill Sienkiewicz issues — the concept has for the most part resulted in second-tier comics for die-hard fans only, from "Generation X," to "New X-Men: Academy X" and the current "Young X-Men." While Schwartz has his own comicbook cred — Adam Brody's character Seth on "The O.C." was a huge comic nerd, though much of that at the time was attributed to writer and one-time comics scribe Allen Heinberg — I expect there's almost zero crossover between the fanbases for X-Men and "Gossip Girl." A pic that tries to graft too much in the way of relationships and romance onto the gravitas and superheroics of the X-Men concept invites the kind of fan backlash that studios prefer to avoid.
Admittedly, this conclusion involves a good amount of speculation. Fox has release no details on the pic and reports conflict as to which mutant characters the film may feature.
Marvel does publish a comic called "X-Men: First Class" that features a more modern and all-ages take on the original X-Men team from the 1960s: Cyclops, Marvel Girl, Beast, Iceman and Angel.But other reports (including Variety's) suggest a pic focused on younger characters from previous pics such as Iceman, Kitty Pryde, Colossus and Rogue. The former would require a complete reboot as the original characters were all of differing ages in the original X-Men trilogy and two of the five (Cyclops and Jean) are dead. It's always made sense to keep one or two original trilogy characters (even if you have to recast) and add in any of the dozens of other mutants featured in the comics. Just off the top of my head are: Gambit, Cannonball, Psylocke, Dazzler, Havok, Polaris, Banshee, and Forge. For villains, we never got to really see the Sentinels, or the Hellfire Club.
Regardless of the cast of characters, keeping the film true to the tone of the best X-Men comics and the original film trilogy is perhaps the most important key to keeping the franchise on track. Deviating too much from what is known to work in this genre almost never works — as Marvel's pre-Avi Arad history in Hollywood will attest.






The
Variety's own Michael Fleming 
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Recent Comments