« Columbia Buys Enron Play | Main | Turteltaub Treasures Disney's Cook »

Unlikely Rivals on the Oscar Circuit

Director-Jane-Campion-at--001

With the Oscar campaign officially underway, I found myself this weekend in the company of the two most prominent women directors in the race – women who share a zeal for filmmaking but whose approach and presentation could not be more at odds.

Jane Campion, 55, made a quintessentially romantic picture in “Bright Star,” but in person she is cerebral, somewhat severe, leans toward post-hippie attire and seems perplexed by the rigors of the award circuit.

Kathryn Bigelow, 57, is tall, model thin, a one-time art student whose gracious manner belies her proclivity for tense, even violent films – “The Hurt Locker” is her contender. Campion did a film about Keats, the English romantic poet, because she realized a few years ago that she was ignorant of the great poets and was determined to read her way through them. She fell in love with Keats’s writings and wanted to tell the story of his fervidly frenetic love affair (he died at age 25).

Bigelow became fascinated with the struggle in Iraq and its impact on its combatants and, with writer Mark Boal, was determined to overcome the resistence to Iraq movies. By nature, she’s more intrigued by man’s love of war than his other romantic expressions.

951-kathryn_bigelow

Indeed, Bigelow’s favorite filmmaker is Sam Peckinpah, whose films were at once violent and impactful.

Both “Hurt Locker” and “Bright Star” are, in a sense, classic art films and could benefit richly if they were showered with nominations. As reluctant spokepersons for their own work, both Bigelow and Campion understand the importance of the game and also its perils.

The films, like their filmmakers, are startlingly different – Campion’s is self-consciously literary, Bigelow’s is devastatingly realistic. Campion’s distributor is the wily Bob Berney, whose company is new to the game. Bigelow’s picture was picked up by Summit, which hit the jackpot with “Twilight” and has money to spend, if it wants to.

On the circuit, Bigelow fascinates audiences, Campion is more stand-offish. They don’t know each other and don’t want to compete. But their paths will keep crossing as the Oscar season progresses and there’s no way of handicapping the results at this early point.

Keats vs. Iraq: Now that’s downright weird.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfc7553ef0120a58a6b27970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Unlikely Rivals on the Oscar Circuit :

Comments

What do their appearances have to do with anything? Why are you comparing two people just because of their sex?

Aside from the fact that it's ridiculous to judge directors based on their looks, it seems equally ridiculous to compare them when their movies are in two completely different genres. Keats vs. Iraq isn't downright weird, it's completely illogical, just as it's illogical to pit Campion and Bigelow against each other because they both happen to be women.

I guess you need to have a sense of irony to appreciate what Bart is saying; he's simply stating the obvious: this is the first awards season race in which two women directors are likely to be competing for honors (about time!), and people will make the inevitable comparisons between their filmic styles and their personas simply because it's such an unusual occurance.


Male directors would never have their looks discussed like this. I would have expected better from Variety!

Not only is drawing attention to superficial "female" qualities such as "attire" offensive, irrelevant and shallow, it perpetuates an archaic and damaging, patriarchal landscape that really needs an overhaul.

It's also just bad writing, a lazy way to find a common thread. This would never have been written about 2 male directors - never.

And Darryl, if you really think that this all too common reduction of talented, accomplished women can be attributed to the unusualness of their situation, you're in as deep a denial as Bart.

Any two male directors who happen to have had some other unusual parallel, would not be reduced to their appearances. Your argument is illogical and in fact actually proves my point: Since it's unusual for women to be nominated, Bart had to make a point of their gender, and to do so, he immediately reduced them to a what our patriarchal society has always considered the embodiment of womanhood - appearances.

And really, since this kind of slanted "reporting" of successful women is so achingly common, Bart's transgerssion is achingly glaring. Darryl, you have to look with better eyes than that.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.



Print Variety
Bookmark
Get Variety:
Variety Mobile Variety Digital Variety Home Delivery
Newsletter Signup:

The Authors

Peter Bart is the editorial director and vice president of Variety.
Michael Fleming has been a Variety reporter since 1990 and is based in New York.