For starters, it's been awhile since you left NBC, so let me just say, as they used to put it on "Ally McBeal," "Bygones."
Now regarding this new gig you've apparently landed, overseeing CNN.
You might have missed it, but I wrote a letter (OK, column) about some of the challenges you'll be facing in this job about a month ago. Not to pat myself on the back, but given your flair for clever promotion, I hope you'll forgive me when I say it's Must-Read (About) TV.
Realizing you're probably kind of busy, let me summarize some of the key points. Here's one passage worth repeating:Trying to position itself as the hard news, genuinely fair-and-balanced alternative to Fox News Channel on the right and MSNBC on the left doesn't address the advantage those channels have in possessing showy personalities (Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity, Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O'Donnell) who can bring viewers back for extended stretches, in much the way talkradio does.
CNN, by contrast, more
closely mirrors newsradio, where listeners tune in to check news,
weather or traffic and scatter just as quickly. It's a valuable role
when there's a major breaking-news event -- and CNN's international
presence still dwarfs competitors -- but not so swell on run-of-the-mill
news days, forcing the channel to engage in a level of hyperbole that
does nothing to buttress its credibility.
At the end of the column, I then presented the new head of CNN (and here's a little secret: I suspected at the time it would be you) with a series of questions, including:Doesn't your challenge boil down to getting people to watch longer? And without becoming partisan, how do you get them to do that?
Can you become "stickier," to borrow a phrase from prior regimes, without being just plain oily?
Do you ever watch "The Daily Show" pieces about CNN? Because you really should -- they're not only entertaining, but quite enlightening about its shortcomings.
The good news is it's probably still possible to improve ratings at CNN. The bad news is every move you make that tarts up the product will be scrutinized, analyzed and dissected by wretches like me, who actually like the idea of holding CNN -- silly us -- to journalistic standards, which makes the whole balancing act that much trickier.
Anyway, best of luck avoiding the landmines. You're going to need it. And no matter how tempting it might be, let me just say three little words of friendly advice: "NO DONALD TRUMP."