"Tell Me You Love Me": So what happened?
That rumble you might've heard earlier this week eminating from the Westside wasn't the screams of youngsters on the Ferris Wheel at the pier but the folks at HBO's Santa Monica headquarters.
With less than 1 million voyeurs tuning in to the premiere episode of "Tell Me You Love Me," the folks at the pay cabler couldn't have been pleased. Shocked may be a better description.
That's a shame, considering "Tell Me" is a smart and introspective look at four couples (including therapist Jane Alexander and her husband) in the midst of relationship turmoil. And, oh yeah, there's lots of sex, too.
There's lots of ways to interpret the numbers. HBO has always said it's more interested in cumulative viewer totals over the week of repeated viewings than what happens on opening night. And the network also previewed "Tell Me" before Sunday, which means some caught a sneak peak.
But even with all that into account, the numbers have to be disheartening. It was a major drop from the "John From Cincinnati" premiere in June, and that one was considered low. The 5.7 million who tuned in for the first-ever "Deadwood," which preemed in March 2004, seems like a "Seinfeld"-like number now.
Maybe some were turned off by all the explicit sex they had read about in reviews. Who knows?
Adding to the cabler's woes was the lowest-ever premiere for "Curb Your Enthusiasm," which obviously got no help from "Tell Me."
So where does HBO go from here? All they or any network can do is continue to make programs that rise above the common denominator and hope that folks give these shows a chance.
But it's undoubtedly been a tough year over there and hard to keep a stiff upper lip, with the sudden departure of Chris Albrecht and the end of "The Sopranos."
Where HBO once ruled the cable universe, those days are long gone now. Showtime has made huge strides with shows such as "Weeds" and "Dexter," while FX has established itself as the gritty basic cable alternative with skeins like "The Shield," "Damages" and "Nip/Tuck." Even networks that didn't have original drama programming just a few years ago, such as AMC and TBS, are now in the game.
This weekend should help, however. "Sopranos" and James Gandolfini could certainly be coming home with Emmys and "Longford" was a stellar piece of work, as was its star, Jim Broadbent.
HBO's closets are filled with Emmys but what it needs now, more than statues, are hits.
— Stuart Levine







Variety's Team TV -- Cynthia Littleton, Stu Levine, Jon Weisman, Andrew Wallenstein and A.J. Marechal -- provides a roundup of stories big and small, as well as opinions and analysis from across the TV dial.
Subscribe to this blog's feed
please don't miss the brand of Canada goose when necessary. (yang)
Posted by: canada goose coat | May 15, 2011 at 06:46 PM
Are you interested in dating sites? Try interracial romance, it is an interracial personal dating website where you can search through thousands of interracial singles looking for love.http://www.interracialsingleonline.com What are you waiting, sign up and start your interracial dating. You can search through thousands of profiles and you can even browse their photo. Fresh new ...
Posted by: Kingvi | October 16, 2007 at 01:09 AM
I'm happy for the fans of "TMYLM" maybe you have the fans of JFC to thank for your second season of this 'soft-core porn.' I myself do not like this show but that's my opinion.
JFC Fans John still needs your support please come by the www.save.JFC.net sign the petition, check out one of our latest campaigns.
Important information:
Support "John" today! Please log into your www.youtube.com account add or regisiter for a free account.
Our "John"----
"Jmonad" really needs subscribers to his www.youtube.com video clips! Easy just click the 'subscribe' button on his user page.
Posted by: chatangel | October 09, 2007 at 04:33 AM
The bigger issue is that the series is too realistic. People tune into television in many cases to escape. Even the "reality TV" is seen by many as contrived - real people trying to act onoe way or another. This program shows actors in roles that approach real life so closely that the viewer feels uncomfortable.
The explicit sex (all of which so far have been restricted to the scenes in the premiere episode) serves a purpose -- unless people are only fast forwarding through their TiVO or On Demand recording. If people were to invest their time and attention to the plot and dialogue, they would see the cinematic value.
Posted by: Larry | September 26, 2007 at 12:29 PM
You guys are farking idiots. I think show has got a lot of potential. From the two first episodes, I thought it was the most realistic portrayal of relationships I'd seen in a TV show.
Posted by: Paul | September 22, 2007 at 09:40 PM
Smart and introspective? Try talky, ugly to look at, and containing on the one hand a cast of untalented complete nobodies clearly hired for their willingness to simulate sex scenes, and on the other a depressing career low for Alexander. To boot, it's less sexually progressive than a whole host of other cable programs from The L Word to Rescue Me to Nip / Tuck. The show has either been written and produced by super-intellectuals divorced from real people and real sex lives, or by idiots. But its no surprise viewers yawned -- advance word was not promising on this, from the earliest coverage on down. The title ironically now comes across like a desperate cry for acceptance -- thank goodness HBO subscribers responded to the plea with a resounding "No."
Posted by: Shep | September 12, 2007 at 05:38 PM
'Rise above the common denominator'? Are you kidding me? Who is this show meant to appeal to, besides viewers who watch cable for the porn? I found this show embarrassing and overwrought (and too many miserable, neurotic characters, frankly). Pornography with higher production values, basiclly.
Posted by: AJ Workman | September 12, 2007 at 05:09 PM