“Big Love” star Bill Paxton is the next guest in our Q&A series. He’ll be answering reader questions here on Season Pass.

HBO’s drama about a polygamist and his three wives bows its third season Jan. 18. While many of HBO’s shows have long hiatuses, “Big Love’s” was extra long due to the WGA strike and hasn’t aired since August 2007. In the interim, the lifestyle portrayed on the show received a worldwide stage in April of 2008 when authorities raided Warren Jeffs’ polygamist compound in Texas and took more than 400 children into protective custody.  According to TV Guide's print edition, the show will address that real-life event in its premiere episode.

I’ll be sitting down with Bill to present your questions on Jan. 14 so please submit them by Jan. 13. You know the drill by now but here are the rules:

1) Hit the comment button below and ask your question by Jan. 13.
2) You may ask more than one question but we are looking for quality, not quantity. Asking more will not guarantee that you’ll get an answer. In the spirit of fairness, we try to give plenty of folks a chance.
3) Read through the other comments to make sure you’re not repeating something that’s already been asked.
4) Keep in mind that actors are not always aware of future plot points.
5) Be clever and have fun.

The person who asks the question Bill likes best will win a DVD set of Season 2.

Posted by Kathy Lyford

(Paxton pictured above with his TV wives, from left, Ginnifer Goodwin, Jeanne Tripplehorn and Chloe Sevigny)

Imagine if infuriatingly fraudulent reporter Scott Templeton were the lead character of HBO's "The Wire," appearing in nearly every scene, infecting the lives of all the characters. 

That's the way things are with network-mate "In Treatment," which has drawn a cadre of passionate supporters who don't seem to mind the endless violations of ethics and good judgment by its lead character, Paul (Gabriel Byrne). Its fans maintain that Paul's crumbling existence is the stuff of great television — the show couldn't ask for a much better champion than Maureen Ryan of the Chicago Tribune, who writes, "The voyeuristic thrill comes from both the fascinating revelations of the patients and from our intimate knowledge of the repressed Paul’s own fraying emotions."

Though I've watched every minute of "In Treatment" so far, I continue to find the show more vexing than thrilling. I certainly have no rules against making an antihero the central figure of a series, but I am struggling to find satisfaction in a universe where all the characters behave in such profoundly flawed ways that it's not clear the writers realize it.

The latest in a long list of breaches to surface came last week, during an episode in which Paul recommended that teenage gymnast Sophie, who has attempted suicide, should resume training with her coach.  Paul's decision hinged on whether Sophie's psyche stood to benefit more from resuming her routine, or whether the stress would be counterproductive. Oh, and there were issues about whether Sophie would trust Paul as her therapist — that sort of thing.

At no point is it considered that hey, maybe the fact that Sophie's coach molested her should be factored into the deliberations. 

Events like these do more than make me unsympathetic toward Paul; they make me deeply hesitant to put my faith in the show. A best-case scenario for "In Treatment" is that the writers (who have adapted the series from an Israeli version) know exactly what they're doing, and the choices they have the characters make are part of a polemic against an entire world of therapy that they consider irresponsible, a farce. (It's worth remembering that with the possible exception of Laura, every patient on the show is overtly hostile to therapy, Gina has abandoned it as a profession and Paul is on the verge. Believe it or not, some people in this world are actually enthusiastic about the practice.)

A more likely scenario is that the writers aren't really in control of the world they've created. It's not that they don't think about what they're doing, but they make their choices based on convenience of plot rather than toward delivering a greater truth.

Contrast this with how David Simon and friends have done on "The Wire." Scott's judgment and excesses are every bit as loathsome as Paul's.  In one sense, Scott (Tom McCarthy) benefits in a comparison to Paul from not directly endangering the mental well-being of the people he is victimizing, although Gus (Clark Johnson) is lucky he's made of tough stuff. But Scott is putting other people's careers — their livelihood — in jeopardy, all out of his own laziness and greed. He's an awful man, lacking in almost any redeeming qualities.

But "The Wire" gives Scott's actions context.  We are confident that the world he lives in has an understanding of right and wrong, regardless of whether Scott himself has that understanding. The good moments that periodically come on "In Treatment" are negated by a universe that doesn't really seem to have any coherent value system.  Paul doesn't have one. Gina, the mentor/therapist who counsels Paul though she knows their personal baggage invalidates such an arrangement, lacks one as well.

Of course, Scott is hardly the only flawed character on "The Wire." In this respect, the grandest offering in the series' final season has perhaps been Jimmy McNulty (Dominic West), who committed all kinds of legal and ethical violations in bringing a dynamic end-justifies-the-means strategy to the police department's investigations, and who is now enduring the consequences in Shakespearean fashion. Truth be told, I find myself more sympathetic to McNulty now than I did at the start of the season. His world's about to crash down on him, but wherever he went wrong on the police side, the constant was his pursuit of a greater good. Paul's selfishness on "In Treatment," however believable, is selfishness for its own sake — and yet this is the program's lead storyline. At the end of the series, short of some profound insight into the plight of the egotistical, what will have been the point?

"I think 'In Treatment's' only real requirement is that it is good fictional drama," Ryan wrote in response to a comment of mine on her blog. "As I said, I've been shocked by some of his actions and the way he's dealing with his patients. No way should he be seeing Gina. Agreed on all fronts. But that's the stuff that's interesting — watching these signs of his arrogance and stupidity come out. All that makes him more intertesting — not necessarily a good therapist, but a deeply conflicted and believably complicated man."

The passion of people I respect toward "In Treatment" frequently makes me wonder whether I'm being too harsh on the show, but I'm still not convinced that being "interesting" is enough. There's no way I could watch "In Treatment" five nights a week if it weren't compelling television. But compelling doesn't always mean satisfying. Good fictional drama, even if its characters aren't responsible, needs a responsible author, and there's still too much evidence that "In Treatment" doesn't quite have one.

— Jon Weisman

(More on Sunday's episode of "The Wire" can be found at Cynthia Littleton — On the Air.)

Watching this seg of "The Wire" is kinda like making Jell-O pudding (regular, not instant) when you're at the the halfway point, when your wrist is starting to get tired of stirring but you can see the payoff coming as the milk thickens into chocolate mud.

Episode 5, "React Quotes," penned by David Simon and David Mills and directed by Angieszka Holland, gallops along in advancing, twisting and expanding the plot. In this sea of unsavory characters, no one is more unctious in this seg than Marlo Stanfield's defense attorney Maurice Levy, who's positively giddy at the prospect of being awash in litigation fees when he realizes that his star client is using a cell phone. "Joe gave him to us just in time," says Levy, played by Michael Kostroff (pictured left).

Cruise on over to Variety's On the Air blog for the rest of this post.

R.I.P. Proposition Joe.

We lost the big fella in last night's episode of "The Wire," as well as the return of Omar, Daniels becoming police commissioner and McNulty and Lester searching for dead bodies.

For a full recap, check out Stuart Levine's deconstruction on Variety's On the Air blog.

Oh, he's a dog, that Scott Templeton. A pompous dog. On the heels of last week's fabrication of the wheelchair-bound 13-year-old kid who was heartbroken (cue the violins) after failing to get into the Orioles' opening day game, Templeton's back in the fiction biz this week in the third seg of "The Wire," "Not for Attribution."

Click here and here for the on-the-record rundown on the latest from "The Wire" on Variety.com's On the Air.

The frothing over "The Wire" continues over on Season Pass' sibling blog, On the Air. Check out the discourse on episode 2, "Unconfirmed Reports," by clicking here, and for a newbie's perspective on the show, click here.

The Wire" is justly praised to the skies for its writing and near docu-style direction.

But what jumps out at my from this opening episode is the sheer number of fine actors in this cast. It's a big cast, and it can be overwhelming at first. But to the credit of the actors and writers, these characters are so well-defined that it doesn't take long at all for the viewer to get a sense of their distinct personalities.

One who has only a few minutes of screen time in the episode (written by series creator David Simon and Ed Burns and helmed by Joe Chappelle) but makes his mark is Reg E. Cathay (pictured right), who plays political strategist Norman Wilson to Aidan Gillen's youthful Mayor Tommy Carcetti (pictured above).

To my mind, Wilson has the best line of the episode when he chides his boss for being so politically minded as to refuse a $50 million bailout for the city's fiscal troubles from the state's Republican governor simply because the nakedly ambitious Carcetti, a Dem, wants to be the next governor and it would make his campaign more difficult. Instead, Carcetti scrambles to juggle the bills, starving the police department (despite campaign promises of raises, new equipment, etc.) to scrape together pennies to funnel to the schools. As it stands, Carcetti now is "just a weak-ass mayor of a broke-ass city," Wilson tells him.

There are two types of people in this crazy, mixed up world. Those who get "The Wire" and those who don't.

(Actually there's a third type, those who can identify Little Walter's "My Babe" by within a nanosecond of hearing the first note, and those people also usually fall into the category of "Wire" fanatics.)

To make the most of the HBO drama's fifth and final season, which bows Sunday at 9 p.m., Variety's resident "Wire" nuts -- including Cynthia Littleton, Brian Lowry, Stuart Levine and any others who care to join in -- will be ruminating and riffing here on each of the upcoming 10 segs. Although we've have had the luxury of screening the first seven episodes (thanks HBO), we're going to be mindful of spoilers, so we'll take go one seg at a time, the Monday after their premiere telecast.

As always, we'd love to hear from readers in this space too about the series that has never been a major ratings success for HBO but does have its fiercely loyal cadre of viewers. "Wire" has always revolved around the life of drug dealers, cops and others in tough neighborhoods in Baltimore, but at its best, it's been more than a gritty slice of life -- it's a unrelenting look at the hypocrisy of the social order, the corruption, bankruptcy and decay of the civic institutions that were once America's pride. To my mind, the upcoming season is more plot-driven than the others, and it's a wild, wild ride, so buckle up.

Click here for more "Wire"-ana, Q&As with creator/exec producer David Simon, Nina Kostroff Noble and cast members Clarke Peters, Wendell Pierce, Andre Royo and Dominic West.

"Curb Your Enthusiasm" kicked off its sixth season tonight with an episode that, for a show that has always treaded a thin line between annoying and uproarious, leaned a bit too much toward the former -- if only because so much of the episode was predictable.  There was one gambit involving repeated references to a certain dessert that paid off, but for the most part the premiere was underwhelming. This was no picking up a prostitute to get access to the carpool lane.

During the episode, I wondered if "Curb," which was groundbreaking in just how far it was willing to stretch the annoyance envelope, has now seen its moment pass. Other shows from "The Office" to "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" risk antagonizing their audience, yet seem fresher in doing so.  In particular, "The Office," which wears its heart on its sleeve right after sticking a knife in it, seems to shine a light on the limitations of "Curb."

But maybe tonight simply wasn't the best "Curb" will have to offer this season - certainly, Larry David and Co. have generated utter masterpieces in the not-too-distant past.  And of course, it only gets harder as a show gets older, and we'll have to see whether something like "It's Always Sunny" can keep the pace.

— Jon Weisman

Welcome to Season Pass, Variety.com’s blog for dishing about fall’s new scripted TV shows.
We wanted to give readers a wide range of opinions on the fall fare so eight of us spent a good chunk of our summer watching all of it. We like to complain, but it was really kind of fun.

Each of us has rated all the shows using four categories:

Love it, setting a season pass now

Worth another try

OK, but not for me

Won't watch again

"Reaper" (below) was one show that took us all by surprise. I did not expect to like it and it ended up being one of my favorites

The shows that rated the highest (one or two thumbs up) among our group of TV junkies were: ABC’s “Pushing Daisies” (seven season passes), NBC’s “Chuck” (four season passes), the CW’s “Reaper” (six season passes), CBS’ “Big Bang Theory” (three season passes), the CW’s “Gossip Girl,” (one season pass), Fox’s “Back To You” (one season pass) and CBS’ midseason entry “Swingtown” (one season pass).

See the chart for more details.

Our opinions are meant as a guide only. We encourage you to give all the shows a try and see for yourself what shows speak to you.

We’ll be blogging after each episode to track the shows’ progress. And we’ll weigh in on topics related to the season.

Have fun and happy channel surfing!