DVRs may not be as bad for advertisers as thought
The broadcasting and advertising communities have, for
years, warned that time shifting television programming is hurting the bottom
line. Since consumers are able to skip past the commercials, they argue, sales
will be impacted (and, ultimately, advertising rates).
Duke University begs to differ.
A three-year study from the school, which will be published in the Journal of Marketing Research, finds that digital video recorders have no impact whatsoever on television advertising.
Duke researchers found that 95 percent of people still watch live television – and even those aren’t necessarily sitting through the commercials. Channel surfing and bathroom breaks are usually timed with ad breaks.
Even folks who fast-forward through DVR’d shows are often watching the ads, albeit at a higher speed and without sound. That still gives companies time to get their message across. And DVR users tend to watch more television than those without, meaning in some ways, they’re seeing more ads.
The study, it should be noted, was partially funded by Tivo.







Subscribe to this blog's feed

TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfc7553ef0133ed4b8e28970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DVRs may not be as bad for advertisers as thought :
Comments