Newspaper Circulation Stats
AP ran a story earlier this week with circulation figures for the top 20 newspapers, which I find fascinating, as it shows that the LAT is doing significantly worse than the other top papers. Why?
For my part, I keep fighting an internal battle over my obligation to keep up my early morning daily newspaper habit. I renewed last time because I was offered an irrestistible package with both Vanity Fair and the LAT. I read so much online that I think I may cut the LAT. Even though I recycle, I feel guilty about all the paper consumption, all the unread sports, California and real estate sections. I have piles of unread mags and papers in my house, and I'm cancelling subscriptions right and left. No more New York, The Week, or More. I'm still hanging on to Time, Newsweek, The New Yorker, Wired, EW...
1. USA Today, 2,278,022, up 0.2 percentHat Tip: Oscarwatch2. The Wall Street Journal, 2,062,312, up 0.6 percent
3. The New York Times, 1,120,420, down 1.9 percent
4. Los Angeles Times, 815,723, down 4.2 percent
5. New York Post, 724,748, up 7.6 percent
6. New York Daily News, 718,174, up 1.4 percent
7. The Washington Post, 699,130, down 3.5 percent
8. Chicago Tribune, 566,827, down 2.1 percent
9. Houston Chronicle, 503,114, down 2 percent
10. The Arizona Republic, 433,731, down 1.1 percent
The rest:
11. Dallas Morning News, 411,919, down 14.3 percent12. Newsday, Long Island, 398,231, down 6.9 percent
13. San Francisco Chronicle, 386,564, down 2.9 percent
14. The Boston Globe, 382,503, down 3.7 percent
15. The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J., 372,629, down 6.1 percent
16. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 357,399, down 2.1 percent
17. The Philadelphia Inquirer, 352,593, up 0.6 percent
18. Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul, 345,252, down 4.9 percent
19. The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, 344,704, up 0.5 percent
20. Detroit Free Press, 329,989, down 4.7 percent







Anne
no thoughts on why lat's numbers are down -- i haven't looked at a newspaper in a few years now (i used to read 2 or 3 in the morning and at least one more in the afternoon)
couldn't agree more on your other comments -- why pay for a subscription? look at the sunday paper -- you get 8 pounds of paper delivered to your doorstep, you only read a few pages, throw rest away.
come on. just log on and point/click, done. who needs 8 pounds of newspaper (especially when it's yesterday's news)? today's news is online, so is the news from 5 minutes ago -- newspapers can't compete.
Posted by: Alan Green | May 03, 2007 at 07:45 PM
In honor of your piece on BLOGS RESHAPING FILM COVERAGE, I thought I'd try equating blogs with the top newspapers. In the future, maybe I'll try magazines and television.
1. USA Today = Movie City News
2. The Wall Street Journal = Deadline Hollywood Daily
3. The New York Times = Gawker
4. Los Angeles Times = Ain't it Cool News
5. New York Post = TMZ
6. New York Daily News = Hollywood-Elsewhere
7. The Washington Post = Oscarwatch
8. Chicago Tribune = Thompson on Hollywood
12. Newsday = Carpetbagger
13. San Francisco Chronicle = The Envelope
14. The Boston Globe = The Hot Blog
I've already tried music: Oscarwatch is Gospel, Hollywood-Elsewhere is Jazz, Movie City News is Country, Thompson on Hollywood is Opera, Incontention (Kris Tapley) is Classical, with Tech Support a lovely Chamber Orchestra, Carpetbagger is Rap, The Envelope is Pop, Deadline Hollywood Daily is R&B, Gawker and The Hot Blog are soul.
Posted by: T.Holly Unfassung | May 06, 2007 at 08:13 AM
Err, make that showtunes for The Hot Blog.
Posted by: T.Holly Unfassung | May 06, 2007 at 08:20 AM