Judging from the latest round of voting from the Gurus O' Gold, the top four Oscar sure shots are not at all surprising:
1. Slumdog
2. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
3. Milk
4. Frost/Nixon
And the consensus on the fifth slot is Dark Knight, with two actor-friendly dramas, Doubt and Revolutionary Road, nipping at its heels. Now's the time that the Academy voters are actually looking (or not looking) at their stacks of DVDs.
Which leads me to wonder why Revolutionary Road waited until the day after Christmas to open? It's not an overtly commercial movie, although many seem to regard it as a big-studio vehicle because of its two stars. (They helped the movie grab a high per-screen-average in limited release.) So it would have been a dicey, costly proposition to hold it in theaters a long time, risking that it would lose steam, as Frost/Nixon has done. But the Academy still likes Frost/Nixon--in this case, its lack of commerciality will be boosted by multiple Oscar nominations, so Universal just has to hang in there.
Usually you can get away with a late entry if you have names like Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio because Academy voters will be sure to watch the movie. Rev Road is just the sort of well-executed high-end literary drama the Academy usually goes for. That's why I'm missing that sense of growing momentum that it should have right now.
By waiting so long, the movie may have lost the opportunity to be explained and supported by critics and press. I feel much of the media stories were more about literary assessments of author Richard Yates than the movie itself. (Discovering Yates was my interest too.)
The movie scored a 70 on Metacritic, which is good, not great. (Benjamin Button got a 69, but it has epic scale and scope; all the tech branches will go for it.) Among Rev Road's champions are Rolling Stone's Peter Travers, who praises DiCaprio, and New York's David Edelstein, who admires Mendes' direction of actors:
Though I’ve never been sold on Mendes’s films (the waterlogged Road to Perdition, pulp plus metaphysics, is an eye-roller), the theater work of his I’ve seen has been uniformly wonderful. Onstage, he has a grasp of design as metaphor, and every dramatic beat is on the nose (without being too on the nose). Revolutionary Road plays to his strengths. The visual set pieces, like the sea of hats emerging from the New York train station, are self-conscious, but get Mendes in a room with quick-witted actors and the crosscurrents are dizzying.
I also like this line in Owen Gleiberman's EW review:
The best thing about Revolutionary Road, a cool-blooded and disquieting adaptation of Richard Yates' 1961 novel about a powerfully unhappy Connecticut couple, is that it doesn't end with that rote vision of bourgeois anomie. It only begins there.
Other Rev Road supporters include the LAT's Ken Turan, Newsweek's David Ansen, and the Village Voice's Scott Foundas, who damns it with faint praise:
Revolutionary Road isn't a great movie -- it lacks the full, soul-crushing force of the novel -- but what works in it works so well, and is so tricky to pull off, that you can't help but admire it.
The WSJ's Joe Morgenstern calls the movie "stifling, all right, and depressing in the bargain."
The New Yorker's David Denby echoes the opinion of his mag's literary editor Roger Angell, who refused to ever acquire a Richard Yates short story:
There's a sourness, a relentlessness about the movie which borders on misanthropy. In both the social and the personal scenes, the conversational tone veers between idiotic pleasantries and fathomless bile, with nothing in between.
A movie like Rev Road may need more enthusiastic support than this. Rev Road is shaping up as more admired than beloved. At the Academy screening this weekend--the year's last--not many voters showed up, although it did get applause. (Many folks are away and will watch it on DVD.) Among those I've talked to who have seen the film, some say it's a tough slog. The Golden Globes helped Winslet and DiCaprio, but the critics groups did not; SAG went for Winslet only; they did not nominate Revolutionary Road for ensemble cast.
Winslet could win--it's her year (thanks to the double-whammy of Road and The Reader) and her competition is weak. (The indie gals may be deemed lucky to be nominated and many do not consider Oscar-winners Cate Blanchett or Streep's performances to be their best.)
Clint Eastwood could steal DiCaprio's best actor slot. And Michael Shannon, despite not getting the SAG love, should get a supporting actor nom.
Will the writers go for Justin Haythe? Will the directors anoint Sam Mendes? Mendes was a new kid on the block with American Beauty. Now he's a mix of outsider/insider--he's a lauded, respected British theater director, but many people, like Edelstein, consider him to be great with actors, but more theatrical than cinematic. I thought he did a great job with this movie. But I'm willing to suffer more than most. The upcoming WGA and DGA noms will be instructive here.
Recent Comments